![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Thursday, July 22, 2010 7:51:09 AM
Hop-on filed a law suit against a prior acquisition for Fraud and Breach of Contract. The opposition received a default judgment against Hop-on. Hop-on, will file to set the default aside and pursue litigation.
anybody wonder why HOP-ON filed a lawsuit, then decided to never actually pursue the lawsuit, resulting in hop-on losing the suit in a defualt judgment against hop-on?
What kind of lawyer(s) does hop-on employ that file lawsuits for hop-on and then automatically lose them because hop-on likely fails to show up to argue their case?
It is pretty hard to believe that hop-on would be able to get the judgment set aside, since they were the one to file the lawsuit and also were the one to fail to show up and argue the case. Judges typically only allow set-asides for those that can argue they didn't know about a suit.....HOP-ON was the one that actually filed the lawsuit.....LOL another blunder by Peter Michaels, I guess.
FEATURED Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM