Thursday, July 22, 2010 7:51:09 AM
Hop-on filed a law suit against a prior acquisition for Fraud and Breach of Contract. The opposition received a default judgment against Hop-on. Hop-on, will file to set the default aside and pursue litigation.
anybody wonder why HOP-ON filed a lawsuit, then decided to never actually pursue the lawsuit, resulting in hop-on losing the suit in a defualt judgment against hop-on?
What kind of lawyer(s) does hop-on employ that file lawsuits for hop-on and then automatically lose them because hop-on likely fails to show up to argue their case?
It is pretty hard to believe that hop-on would be able to get the judgment set aside, since they were the one to file the lawsuit and also were the one to fail to show up and argue the case. Judges typically only allow set-asides for those that can argue they didn't know about a suit.....HOP-ON was the one that actually filed the lawsuit.....LOL another blunder by Peter Michaels, I guess.
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM