Janice, I'm not sure what you mean with what you said below:
"Bob seems to be entirely disengaged, so I don't really think that's going to happen."[/I]. You do know that Bob's health is not very good at the present time, right?
But if you mean that they won't give FNLH an extension because of Bob's background that doesn't make sense. As we all know by now, the SEC halted FNLH for failure to file it's financial's for the past 5 years and NOT because of Bob's background am I correct with this assumption?
Again, not allowing the company to file because of a CEO background doesn't make any sense to me. Do you really think that Bob is the only corrupt CEO running a Pink Sheet company? Think again my dear. IMO and from what I've seen a VERY high percentage of Pink Sheet are run with scumbags that have been in trouble with the SEC but yet their companies continue to trade and if they file when halted they will resume trading regardless of the CEO's background. Am I making sense??
I think if FNLH or any other company makes an attempt to file 3 years or so they SHOULD BE GIVEN AN EXTENTSION TO FILE THE REMAINING YEARS that's if the SEC cares about shareholders and that will lose their entire investment.
Of course the question is:
Can FNLH file those 3 years of financial's?? Highly unlikely because Bob doesn't have "two wooden nickels to rub together" so it's a long shot - but now and again, a longshot does win the race.
Janice, thanks for all your informative input to this board.
