InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 970
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/09/2009

Re: righty post# 1845

Thursday, 07/15/2010 5:22:16 AM

Thursday, July 15, 2010 5:22:16 AM

Post# of 1935
Do you think the $13M tax break they mention has anything to do with the PTFCQ NOL?

The way the statement reads they are attributing the $13.7M tax charge to the Penn store acquisition & not the tax credit.

______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________

....The company also booked a $13.3 million income tax benefit, reversing a $13.7 million tax charge from last year that was related to the Penn Traffic acquisition....

There should be a comma after the word year if they meant to attribute the $13.3M tax credit to the Penn stores acquisition. I added the red comma in the sentence below to help show what I mean.

....The company also booked a $13.3 million income tax benefit, reversing a $13.7 million tax charge from last year, that was related to the Penn Traffic acquisition....

______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
I do not know that it makes a difference to us one way or the other, it's just the part of the statement that caught my attention.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.