InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 289
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/04/2004

Re: Jagman post# 1910

Monday, 01/24/2005 4:51:34 PM

Monday, January 24, 2005 4:51:34 PM

Post# of 7422
I don’t think ALMI is setting the marketing terms for sexiness. US Navy and its researchers refer to the tubes as Micro tubes, due to the fact they were working on this patent prior to NANO buzz starting, and they continue to refer to them as such. But what ALMI has been referring to as Micro tubes are actually Nanotubes because of their size as cited by Dr. Ron Price, but as I said When Dr. Price began he was using a name that fit the sciences he was working in. So no real name change just clarity. I asked bill the importance and he said anyone willing to pay northward of $500 per ton can call it what they want.

I have also been speaking to some "NANO" experts and they feel that if you remove the tubes from the clay you still have the clay. For example New Zealand's clay has no tubes thus not in the same NANO space as ALMI but their clay is very marketable without the tubes. But my Scientist friends think that taking the tubes out wont change the clay that much and bill should still have a clay product to sell. I have emailed him my findings and awaiting a response.


DD Out!