InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 15456
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/30/2001

Re: spokeshave post# 1107

Wednesday, 10/02/2002 2:21:31 PM

Wednesday, October 02, 2002 2:21:31 PM

Post# of 151692
Spokesshave, this has been explored ad nausium.

You claim to have no industry knowledge but you didn't get those numbers from out of thin air.

Hammer isn't in production so the engineering capacity consumed is insignificant. Same for Barton. With "The Best Yields in the World" TB should yield upwards of 270 GDPW. AMD sold about 8 million per quarter but until recently many of those were Durons. Nevertheless F30 should be able to produce > 16 million TBs. With actual output <50% of capacity why does AMD claim "normal yield constraints"? How can they be constrained with half their fab free? With 50% of their capacity unutilized surely they could provide a trickling of Bartons or Hammers if they were anywhere's near manufacturable. The elevated ASPs would be a desperately needed to stem the flow of blood yet they are non existent. The only samples of hammer seen run at 800MHz. How many wafers did they need to burn to get those crippled samples? Half their fab? Has anyone seen samples of Barton? Why not if they have so much free space? The easiest explanation is there aren't any Bartons because there aren't any Bartons and the same goes for Hammer.

EP

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INTC News