100% agree, but we don't need an examiner to tell us that do we? Maybe we do...so that the examiner can legally conclude that the NOL's can't go to JPM as a matter of law?
Maybe I'm just being cynical but I have this feeling that the examiner isn't/won't be our savior. I think it will come down the the NOL's. Keep in mind the news of the NOL's is what propelled the pref's back in December to the 10% fv level.
But that's why I asked about an example if historically examiner's have significantly elevated the value of an estate in a BK case. If anyone has heard about one in a different board or anywhere else I think we all would benefit.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.