InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 72136
Next 10
Followers 7
Posts 683
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/06/2001

Re: None

Friday, 07/02/2010 6:06:57 PM

Friday, July 02, 2010 6:06:57 PM

Post# of 72136
Has anyone considered the fact that UNLA, a profitable company, must believe that MDGC has something to bring to the JV? Surely they must have some insight into what was determined by the AXS team?

What do they see MDGC bringing to the table?

FWIW, how about:

1) Patents that UNLA must deem valuable (based on knowledge of the AXS report?). Why would other patent attorneys be retained if AXS didn't recommend pursuit of licensing/damages, etc.?

2) MDGC has an approved China connection--partnership with China's Academy of Broadcasting Science (ABS), a division of the central government State Administration of Radio, Film and Television (SARFT). With UNLA's purchase of 80% of the Chinese telecom co., this might speed things up for them too.

3) Wytec, etc.

If UNLA wants them next door, then that sounds like they see real value in MDGC. If GTW, another profitable company, wants a JV, then they must see value. At this point it is obvious that they know more than the shareholders of MDGC. I'm holding.

All jmo