The “machine-or-transformation” test is not dead - Justice Steven’s concurrence states that this test is “a critical clue.” However, what we are left with after the Supreme Court’s decision is a collection of past statements that alone or taken as a whole provide no clear boundaries as to subject matter patentability under 35 USC § 101. The Supreme Court, in simply removing the layer of law added by the Federal Circuit, and not providing further analysis, seems to be inviting the Federal Circuit to try again: “we by no means foreclose the Federal Circuit’s development of other limiting criteria that further the purposes of the Patent Act …” (slip opinion at 16).
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.