InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,447.87
(
-0.31%
)
US TECH 100
18,978.00
(
-1.19%
)
Dow Jones
39,411.21
(
0.67%
)
Brent Oil
85.14
(
-0.16%
)
Bitcoin
60,584.18
(
0.53%
)
Post# of 15765
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Tonguehair

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 3
Posts 152
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/12/2005

Tonguehair

Re: gotinearly post# 334

Wednesday, 01/19/2005 4:27:27 PM

Wednesday, January 19, 2005 4:27:27 PM

Post# of 15765
It does appear to be a positive thing (the forward split), but I wonder at the CEO's confidence that the company can fulfill the Nasdaq's requirements in early 2005 (see PR from a little while back). There's a $4/sh minimum requirement; that seemed fantastic with a current price of $0.20-.30/sh on 32m o/s. But at 120m o/s?? This is the piece that is definitely missing, imo.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up