InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 51
Posts 1571
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/15/2009

Re: glenrice67 post# 122

Tuesday, 06/22/2010 2:01:48 PM

Tuesday, June 22, 2010 2:01:48 PM

Post# of 4146
First of all, Cohens report on NT isnt fluffy in any way. Its states facts and opinions that I feel represent the company fairly. The other campaigns that have gone out on NT were 3rd party generated and the company has little to no control over them.

Are there ounces of gold at Bullmose? If there is none, we have a problem. However, that sceneraio is far from the truth as Bullmoose has been properly analyzed for gold reserves as completed by Ross Grunwald P.Eng., 1984.

The financials in the company are going to change dramatically here in the near future in my opinion as they begin to harvest the fruit from their garden.

The Valentine property would be a great addition and I hope it gets finalized soon, which is a "value ad on ".

Its a new day for NT Mining. Cash in the bank or equity on/in the ground, what's the difference. This isnt a bio-tech with an idea to cure cancer. The gold on both my ring fingers is the same thing that this company now has in their possession. This gives investors a bit more confidence in the worth of a company, rather then what they find in the co's financials. Gold companies are great and very different in this capacity; I have done well with these types of plays.

Grassroots report gives a target of .82 cents pre Valentine aquisition. Could it reach this level?? Will see here... If NT can solidify the Vanentine Mountain property, I would say yes. Time will tell.

I hear ya, but these our my thoughts....