Risi,
Of course I don't mind, but I should point out that you are amending my own amendment. My original post said:
"Using as support a link to a financial statement showing data that is 16 months old (a/o 2/28/09).........a financial statement inclusive of and preceded by approximately 2 years of financial statements that the SEC demands MUST be restated.......wouldn't seem exactly kosher."
Hoggey judged me to be "a little overzealous", so I gave him the Fisher Price version on the second pass. My original and your amendment are more complete and accordingly more accurate.
Now you're a little overzealous, too.
:o)
Not at the table, Carlos.