David does seem to have a point there, dupedbysteve.
He has provided his real name, we have independent verification of who he is, and we know that he has purchased some trees - even the number, species, year and what they cost him.
That about sums up all the information we might need as proof of identity and having a stake in this game.
Can you explain what information you are talking about that David is asking for from others that he hasn't been willing to give? Or are you just spewing some meaningless nonsense?
Everyone is welcome to have an opinion, even non-TATF clients, and anyone can post here. I don't have the power to limit this discussion to TATF clients and wouldn't if I could.
Both dupedbysteve and belmontx indicate that they are former tree owners and don't currently have money on the table. Meanwhile, they scoff at the idea that discussions on this board can affect our financial interests. Well, that is true in their case. I understand that your sense of morality has been offended by your perception of the way that TATF does business. But I still have a financial stake here, I'm not ready to burn down the building and lynch the owners as you seem to be. Fun as that might be for those with offended senses of morality, it doesn't do a thing for the health of my investment.
dupedbysteve, I guess the non-disclosure agreement or "talk nice" agreement that we perceived you might be under after you indicated you had made a deal with Steve is now over?
