InvestorsHub Logo

BTH

Followers 16
Posts 4145
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/11/2010

BTH

Re: mrplmer post# 343

Monday, 06/14/2010 4:35:38 PM

Monday, June 14, 2010 4:35:38 PM

Post# of 80490
I agree 100% with you regarding Ariad "needing" to partner '534.

They don't "need" to for monetary purposes. They "need" to for all the other reasons that come along with having a large bio-pharma sponsor. Clinical trial expertise, funding combo studies, clinical trial designs, collaborations between smaller company and larger company, etc., and, of course, money.

Ariad has a much stronger balance sheet with the Rida deal. Yes.

I do not care what others here (who have been shareholders for, gulp, 10-15 years?) say about 'not needing to partner'. They're right, they don't 'need to partner.' - But, it would be the responsible thing to do. It would rapidly increase the clinical trials, it would rapidly increase combo studies, and all the other reasons I have listed above. Ariad doesn't need to give away the far in the U.S.

IMO, I think an equity stake from a large pharma would be a great idea. The problem is this: the current stock price. I don't want my shares diluted at these levels. $8-$10/share equity investment - go right ahead!!! It's MUCH better than giving it to the swines at BVF and Orbimed who only want to make money and play games (like shorting etc.) into equity investments.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.