InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,870.62
(
-1.32%
)
US TECH 100
19,946.00
(
0.42%
)
Dow Jones
43,444.99
(
-0.70%
)
Brent Oil
71.46
(
1.06%
)
Bitcoin
91,792.79
(
2.14%
)
Post# of 346922
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

loanranger

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 209
Posts 32386
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/30/2009

loanranger

Member Level

Re: loanranger post# 322486

Sunday, 06/13/2010 9:11:03 PM

Sunday, June 13, 2010 9:11:03 PM

Post# of 346922
"Interesting that his attorneys had requested delays and then came in ahead of schedule."

Wrong. He was granted a delay until Friday and he filed his response on Friday. Sorry.

It will be interesting to see if Speranza's answer to the original complaint was filed Friday, when it was due. And interesting to see if any of the parties that were scheduled to answer the freeze/PI motion, who theoretically weren't granted second extensions, filed on Friday. Pacer should be busy.
I still am unable to find evidence that Pensley was served with the original complaint.

I'm tryin ta think but nuttin happens......Curly, the deepest of the Stooges.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up