InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,751.07
(
0.90%
)
US TECH 100
19,476.00
(
1.10%
)
Dow Jones
42,352.75
(
0.81%
)
Brent Oil
77.97
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
61,893.27
(
-0.29%
)
Post# of 8307
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Bluzie2

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 10
Posts 734
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/27/2009

Bluzie2

Re: loginusername post# 1920

Friday, 06/11/2010 11:50:17 AM

Friday, June 11, 2010 11:50:17 AM

Post# of 8307
To me, that illustrates the strength of the argument. The argument is simple and doesn't need a lot of gymnastics to support it.

Read some of Weil's filings - my goodness, they're so convoluted that I scratch my head, and the arguments are built in a series of assumptions that depend on one another to build. Really, you can never predict what a court will do, but I would not be willing to bet on Weil prevailing. Of course, as a DIMEQ holder, I obviously haven't. . .
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up