InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 592
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/15/2008

Re: GreyGoose_69 post# 17718

Thursday, 06/10/2010 2:35:22 AM

Thursday, June 10, 2010 2:35:22 AM

Post# of 61041
I wouldn't be surprised if my figures aren't as erroneous as you claim.
I know I just used a double negative there, you don't have to remind me.

The 500k figure was a low ball.
100% boardmarks to investors was an overestimate.

Within those two guesstimates lies the figure of 125 mil.
125M x .002 avg / 250 = $1000

There's a lot of people on this board that got in for a lot cheaper than .002 and spent a lot more than 1k.

So no, I don't think I'm too far off.


I don't expect them to P/R a void because they feel bad for us.
I expect them to do so because I believe they were anticipating their pps being .005+ & this not all getting found out.

What good is a 40:1 if your pps going in is 75% less than you were expecting?