InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 298
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/24/2009

Re: captain puff post# 30489

Wednesday, 06/09/2010 3:15:04 PM

Wednesday, June 09, 2010 3:15:04 PM

Post# of 47790
During the month of April,

I was under the impression there were no funding deals on the table, & the assets were lien'ed on. Knowing that, I sold my entire position for the 2nd time and took a loss. I did not want to get caught in another D-Day. I was pissed & vented on this board which did no good for me, the company or anyone else that reads here. I have already stated in previous posts that I was clearly wrong for doing that.

As you know there are two sides to every story & back in April I was under the impression of just Kampa's side of the story. Even though I had a zero share count, my family still has 5 PPM's & 5 Warrants. So, I talk to a few people to find out what is really going on. I have to tell you that I have been enlightened & now I am behind Scott Copeland 100% once again. I have been told there is a plan & there is nothing wrong w/ Exobox that cannot be fixed. I have since been buying back shares slowy to not drive the price up. I am trying to recoup my loss.

As Skipper explained the oil deal to me, I understood his intention was not to fund Exobox w/ their income. IMO, his intention was to give Exobox value as assets. He said "he new some were producing & some were not & that oil/gas does not go w/ Technology" but they gave Exobox a positive asset & his plan was to take Exobox to AMEX. AMEX's #1 concern is asset holdings.

Get Exobox some value = PPS rise = Selling of treasury shares for funding = more PPS rise.

Kampa canned that deal, then did not pursue a funding opprtunity, & liened on the asset's. When I found that out my position has totally changed & now I have aligned myself w/ who I think has my family/friends best intentions in mind......Skipper & Scott

You tell me, which one of the aforementioned plans sounds shifty