InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 298
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/24/2009

Re: JACKPC2001 post# 30469

Wednesday, 06/09/2010 1:09:44 PM

Wednesday, June 09, 2010 1:09:44 PM

Post# of 47790
Hey JackPC, I think of it as a lesser of two evils. You do know that Regan tried to sell the SUEZ Tech for 1.2 Million prior to Skipper's deal. When the money ran out in 2009, Skipper's deal was the only one on the table. Regan had to go w/ it.

The Above is (Fact!)

Did any investor groups or posters of this board have a deal on the table at the time. I seriously doubt it. Sam Skipper saw his move & he took it. It's called playing Hardball & that is how business is sometimes. When Scott, Reggie, & Mark returned their shares per Sam Skipper. All shareholder's PPS value went up 22%, & when Sam Skipper took his 50 Million share cut that 22% was reduced down to about 18%. He gave back 20 Million so presently shareholder's PPS increase is somewhere around 20%. Thanks being to Skipper because Scott, Reggie, & Mark would not have done it if they were not forced.

Shareholders can also look @ things this way because there is always a flipside to everything. If it wasn't for Skipper I assure you Exobox would have been liquidated by Regan in 2009. So in essence, Skipper gave shareholders another chance.

I personally would be happy w/ someone getting 50 Million shares for: Donating his office building & resources for Exobox, Operate & produce as a consultant, raise my share value 20%, & give me probably the last chance for a return on my family/friends investment.

Poster's on this board are always focusing on the negative. In actuallity killing their own investment. IMO, people need to try to start focusing on the positive. Call Skipper & schedule a personal meeting....I did.