InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252431
Next 10
Followers 56
Posts 1150
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/12/2005

Re: DewDiligence post# 96963

Wednesday, 06/09/2010 11:29:36 AM

Wednesday, June 09, 2010 11:29:36 AM

Post# of 252431
The issue with ipi approval is not so much the data but whether BMY got FDA agreement for the second SPA edit. The SPA stated the study arm was ipi+gp100. BMY's comments at ASCO indicated they considered the study arm to be any ipi vs gp100. They'll clearly apply for approval for ipi monotherapy and not ipi+gp100.

Unless BMY got approval for this second edit, the stat geeks at the FDA are going to have issues with this shift. I'm not saying the FDA turns the BLA down, just that the stat review section should be interesting.

I've been away for two weeks on the road at AUA/ASCO. Did y'all come to any conclusion whether the ipi label would be limited to HLA-2+ patients (51% of the market) due to the fact these were the only patients allowed in the trial?

Unless otherwise indicated, this is the personal viewpoint of David
Miller and not necessarily that of Biotech Stock Research, LLC.
We're on Twitter at BiotechStockRsr

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.