InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 28
Posts 1338
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/29/2009

Re: G37S post# 21091

Tuesday, 06/08/2010 7:37:46 PM

Tuesday, June 08, 2010 7:37:46 PM

Post# of 33232
The PRs are annoying.

1. Why announce a PR that can be taken as negative? Why even bother? The implications on the last PR could be either positive or negative - so it was confusing at best.

2. They have the meeting - and then no result.

There is no REASON in this....reason as in "sense." This makes NO SENSE!!!!

A CEO should be doing his fiduciary responsibility to his shareholders to improve the stock price by announcing positive things about the company and doing everything in his power to improve the PPS.

Instead, they have a B.S. PR about something that may lower the stock price.

THEN.....they don't bother telling whether anything happened OR NOT!!!!

It is as if they are trying to tank the PPS on purpose (which only makes sense if they are trying to repurchase stock).

THEN....the CEO buys 5M shares - which is not that much (it is only 0.05% of the company, with a total value at the current PPS of $3,500).

I am not sure if this is smoke and mirrors or what.

I also find it weird that the CEO only owns a total of 5,500,000 shares. I own more than twice what the CEO owns.

It seems that they are trying to get the CEO to some minimum level for something.

Sure wish someone else had some insight on this.


"The difference between a successful person and others is not a
lack of strength, not a lack of knowledge, but rather a lack of
will." --- Vince Lombardi