InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 298
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/24/2009

Re: the_kube post# 30248

Sunday, 06/06/2010 4:43:41 PM

Sunday, June 06, 2010 4:43:41 PM

Post# of 47790
You are right on a lot of points,

Dillon made the bad decision to have the SAAS developed instead of SUEZ. The SAAS did not pan out as money makers as planned so the SUEZ coding never happened. The SAAS income was supposed to pay for the SUEZ coding.

Dillon did misapropriate a lot of funds (e.g. lavish office, huge salaries, etc.) on a positive note he slung so much paper regarding the patents you have to give him credit. We have three patents now w/ 20 pending. I am by no means defending Dillon, I am just agreeing w/ you & stating what he did.

I do not understand why you want to give Kampa credit for being a good businessman. He had an opportunity to fund Exobox for 5 million dollars & never even called the people back. That amount of money would have payed for all the coding. He took his back salary owed to him from Exobox & collateralized 100% of yours & my assets w/ it. Kampa = Bankrupt Exobox & take the tech.....not a good businessman for me. As a matter of fact I am pretty F@#$ing Pissed at that. I can't understand why more people are not.