Sunday, June 06, 2010 4:43:41 PM
Dillon made the bad decision to have the SAAS developed instead of SUEZ. The SAAS did not pan out as money makers as planned so the SUEZ coding never happened. The SAAS income was supposed to pay for the SUEZ coding.
Dillon did misapropriate a lot of funds (e.g. lavish office, huge salaries, etc.) on a positive note he slung so much paper regarding the patents you have to give him credit. We have three patents now w/ 20 pending. I am by no means defending Dillon, I am just agreeing w/ you & stating what he did.
I do not understand why you want to give Kampa credit for being a good businessman. He had an opportunity to fund Exobox for 5 million dollars & never even called the people back. That amount of money would have payed for all the coding. He took his back salary owed to him from Exobox & collateralized 100% of yours & my assets w/ it. Kampa = Bankrupt Exobox & take the tech.....not a good businessman for me. As a matter of fact I am pretty F@#$ing Pissed at that. I can't understand why more people are not.
ILUS Provides an Update on the Binding Term Sheet Signed with Actelis Networks (NASDAQ: ASNS) • ILUS • May 31, 2024 12:52 PM
Element79 Gold To Provide Summary and Update on Active Exploration Program, Community Relations at RMEC on June 4 • ELEM • May 30, 2024 1:18 PM
Branded Legacy Secures Exclusive Extraction Partnership with One of the World's Largest Kava Distributors and Producers • BLEG • May 30, 2024 8:30 AM
ECGI Holdings, Inc. Announces $2 Million Debt-to-Equity Conversion • ECGI • May 30, 2024 8:30 AM
North Bay Resources Reports Assays up to >25% Mg, 0.1% Ni, 0.1% Cu, 0.01% Co, 0.3 ppm Pt at Tulameen Platinum Project, British Columbia • NBRI • May 29, 2024 9:03 AM
One World Products, Inc. Issues Shareholder Update • OWPC • May 29, 2024 8:20 AM