You dont know what you are talking about my friend, hehehe. How can you prove to me that the overhead issue is resolved?
1.) You cannot change the IP Overhead because you will violate the current standard.
2.) Changing the standard would mean you will have your own way which will invalidate their claim to be standards based.
3.) If you cannot change the Overhead then that would mean that the packet format is still the same i.e. it has huge overhead.
4.) In VPN technology, a slight changes in the packet will cause a huge difference on the hash of the packet and so is the encryption key when compared and when this happens the packet will be dropped.
5.) How can BT say that theirs is more secure than the others if the current standard security available in the market is 3DES? If they are basing their solution on this then all companies who will use this same 3DES technology will have the same security level as with BT.
6.) BT solution is point to point i.e from Cellphone to the corporate network (no matter what is medium in between), this is why they are using VPN to secure the connection.
Like what I have said, BT offering is just a work around and not a solution of the problem, BT is trying to market their product to take advantage of the lack of available solution in the industry today. The problem cannot be solved by just putting software on the system and software alone is not a complete solution.
I am not telling you that CLYWs ASNAP is better than BT but I can tell you that there is no solution available in the market yet and you can ask all the industy expert to verify this claim.
