![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Saturday, May 29, 2010 12:56:50 AM
My opinion is that we signed Mr. Hartley to an agreement, as in Employment agreement. If we actually acquired the company, we actually acquired the debts, obligations, tax liens, and material obligations of this company. The release specifically states that we did not assume any of the mentioned liabilities. Impossible since Builders choice has substantial debt, a sizable tax lien and active UCC's that encumber each and every asset of the company, both future and present.
Mr. Hartley would not be the first former officer of Builders choice to join D & D displays in my opinion. For example, is Mr. Hartzog still employed with Builders Choice?
If it is possible to acquire another company's encumbered assets without assuming any existing liabilities then why didn't Mr. Brown use the same "magic acquisition sprinkle dust" when taking D & D displays public through the merger/acquisition? I look forward to any response.
my opinion only
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM