Saturday, May 29, 2010 12:56:50 AM
My opinion is that we signed Mr. Hartley to an agreement, as in Employment agreement. If we actually acquired the company, we actually acquired the debts, obligations, tax liens, and material obligations of this company. The release specifically states that we did not assume any of the mentioned liabilities. Impossible since Builders choice has substantial debt, a sizable tax lien and active UCC's that encumber each and every asset of the company, both future and present.
Mr. Hartley would not be the first former officer of Builders choice to join D & D displays in my opinion. For example, is Mr. Hartzog still employed with Builders Choice?
If it is possible to acquire another company's encumbered assets without assuming any existing liabilities then why didn't Mr. Brown use the same "magic acquisition sprinkle dust" when taking D & D displays public through the merger/acquisition? I look forward to any response.
my opinion only
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM