InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 83
Posts 41815
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/05/2010

Re: Henry Jo Bob post# 15372

Thursday, 05/27/2010 6:39:35 PM

Thursday, May 27, 2010 6:39:35 PM

Post# of 22746
"Then one of three things have happened: 1) there was no such call 2) the IR guy does not understand the ramifications of being suspended, or 3) he's lying."

"Or 4)they are providing all the required info to the SEC and the market and all is just fine."

1.) the call was plausible because I received a call from IR in response to my voicemail. I had spoken with him in the past, so it wasn't a a shot in the dark on my part.

2.) That's possible. I emailed IR the info on the form 211 required to resume trading. I don't know if a thorough and completely satisfactory response to the SEC's concerns negates the form 211 requirement. I assume that the SEC is mistaken from time to time.

3.) It's possible. But to what end?

4.)The actual statement was "all that the SEC asked for AND more....proof of business with companies mentioned in offending PR's and with other companies".

Even if #4 is accurate, we don't know whether or not everything will be just fine.

One last point. Your degree of belief in anything you read on these boards shoud be inversely proportional to the certitude expressed by the poster. We've ALL seen evidence of the validity of that 'theorem' as it applies to this board.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.