Another scam PR put out by ITKG.
"At the request of the customer its name will not be published so as to enhance its competitive advantage in utilizing ElectriPlast™."
If ElectriSCAM was a product that the markets really wanted then didn't ITKG just give away the competetive edge with the above statement.
If I am understanding this PR stunt, the product usage would, in theory, constitute the competetive edge, not the name of the company that we all know is just another ruse like Jasper Rubber. Wouldn't the license protect the competetive edge???
Of course, I could be wrong. Maybe ITKG got $1.50 for this license agreement rather than the dollar that Jasper paid them.
Again, prison time would seem appropriate here.
