"They say the statements made previously RE BP, etc. are true and we have no reason to doubt this.'
His reply is entirely consistent, in both content and tone, with what he told me during his phone conversation with me yesterday.
Left unstated by me was his statement to me that the "largest single investor in ACLH was also unconcerned about the suspension of trading."
Now of course these statments beg the questions as to whether or not ACLH was truthful in their statements to Mr. Andrews, whether or not he appreciates the seriousness of a suspension regardless of a company's belief in its case and whether or not the largest investor can wait till hell freezes over before ACLH trades again. Deep pockets have staying power.
Everybody is free to believe which way this is going to pan out.
Categorical statements that it will or will not work out favorably for ACLH investors should be treated with equal scorn.
And last I checked, we have NO back orders on scorn on this board. Shelves are full!
