2late, Arkait, Allez: You still do not get it. The CEO as you reported stated in a PR that he tried to swing a deal. That alone is incriminating for a civil law suit for not acting with fiduciary responsibility on behalf of BCIT and the shareholders. There is nothing negative here as it is just stating the fact that I am making the case for Attaway needing to know. Therefore, Megas may not contribute to the fund as this may result in conflict of interest. Thank you all for supporting my case.
It is obvious even with the PR you still want to look the other way per Megas fiduciary responsibility for BCIT and the shareholders.
All I have stated is that Megas needs to be included for Attaway to look at and the information you just reported supports this position. Because of your position here not wanting to include Megas, I am not in favor of the fund at this time.
Time and the Creator of it are my friends