InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,560.72
(
0.94%
)
US TECH 100
19,829.20
(
0.96%
)
Dow Jones
39,343.48
(
0.09%
)
Brent Oil
86.45
(
-1.01%
)
Bitcoin
56,529.63
(
-0.79%
)
Post# of 22746
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

jojobeans

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 126
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/08/2010

jojobeans

Re: greedy__malone post# 14890

Wednesday, 05/26/2010 10:04:38 AM

Wednesday, May 26, 2010 10:04:38 AM

Post# of 22746
greedy, imo ACLH could have avoided all of this if they just answered the SEC' email and or telephone calls and tried to either get a solution or , if their PR was not correct or make a retraction correcting the PR(s) in question.

Yes I am a holder but not talking to a regulator when questioned makes it look pretty bad and because of that, they brought this on to themselves and all of us who bought..
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up