I will not contribute to put the onus on Megas. I would contribute if I knew attorney would include Megas in research to finding him negligent. As IMO he dropped the ball as CEO when he knew a crime was committed and did not use fiduciary responsibility to report the crime 'immediately' upon his findings to proper authority(s). What did Megas know and when did he know it? He will not answer this question, IMO, because I would like to think he is smart enough to understand fiduciary responsibility. IMO, he failed BCIT original shareholders and the fake shareholders and the market system. Yes we may have our own opinions about the DTC and SEC and such, but that does not mean we can ignore responsibility of running a company. That means reporting a crime when it occurs.
Time and the Creator of it are my friends