Define 'bad' lol
TIV has a long history of putting out misleading PR after misleading PR, translating 5 minute flow tests after weeks of pent-up pressure into daily flow rates and PR'ing as if those were sustained and sustainable rates. Subsequent DOGGR reports clearly showed the facts, which were factually light years away from what TIV had in the 'news', er, PRs.
In my book, that's 'bad', as in 'bad boys'. ;)
It remains to be seen whether the heavy dilution of TIV's stock is 'bad' or not. Past dilutions raised money for projects that have not added significant earnings per share or dimes per share in PPS. Maybe some of that will pay off some day. So far, not.
I wasn't at all implying that your calls/trades were 'stories' as in fabricated. Telling stories about trades is fun. Perhaps I used the wrong word, let me know what one word you would prefer as a shortcut for 'relating past factual trading'.
jonesie
p.s. I am absolutely sure there is not a TIV short in existence who would say something 'bad' about TIV! Pretty much any short up to this point that isn't in the green shouldn't be shorting stocks, and I can't see how a short couldn't be in the green right now. On the other hand, longs who bought into TIV's claims at $16, $12, $8, $6, $2 etc might see TIV's follow-through as 'bad'. JMHO!
Yorkville / Cornell Tracking Board #board-9964
"I can think of no more valuable commodity than information"
