I think you need to read between the lines, carefully, in the last meaningful PR / article that came out... seems to me that was back in October... which year ???
What did that have them saying ? ABSY... nothing... but...
There was a quote from the SPLS people to the effect that they'd determined it was going to be more cost effective for them to take the development/deployment effort "IN HOUSE"...
Hmmmm...
There are posts here saying the company has responded to some investor comms, since then, still saying things are on track ???
They've not ever responded to any of my requests for information in that time...
I think there is a need to know more about what it actually means that SPLS took the effort "in house"...
It could easily explain why there is no longer any obvious activity at the ABSY offices... and it easily could mean that they took the "value" as well as "the effort" from ABSY, to have that be moved "in house" at SPLS, too...
I think they do have an obvious need to explain what the situation vis a vis the SPLS effort is... and to explain to the investors here what the nature of "the deal" was, that seems it was done, that moved the effort "in house" at SPLS...
Otherwise, this is already trading at "shell stock" prices anyway... assuming you do know what the actual number in the outstanding is, so I don't know how big a deal it would be to have them prove there isn't any value left here, when it is already priced as if there is no value left here...
I don't expect hearing "sales are taking longer than expected to materialize" will matter, now... when the questions to ask now are about what ABSY still actually owns...
JMHO
.JPG)
.JPG)
