Thursday, May 20, 2010 6:49:41 PM
I said:
I believe that, because whether they had the acre on the SA site or not, they DID NOT BUILD a one acre PBR. So, though I appreciate the DD you do in pulling up the old posts, the "availability of land" argument is trivial to what I'm saying.
Here's a quote from a more recent PR than you previously posted (this one is dated Jan 4th, 2010):
If they were preparing for a one-acre commercial PBR build, why didn't they prep ground for a one-acre PBR?
Clearly the acres they were referring to for Omega 3 production (one in SC, one in SA) still needed to be built out.
Whether the reason was permitting, change of plans, whatever... you don't build something 1/16th the size of the original plan and believe it will satisfy the order. You think as they were laying the tubes down for 6000 sq ft, that they thought they were building the production unit that would satisfy the order they previously needed two acres to fill?
My statement stands.
And what I'm referring to on the message boards is the assumption that the demo unit IS the production unit, and using that assumption to pound on the company because the tubes aren't green, and "we'll never fill the order."
Yes, plans change. In my opinion, lately, for the better. Time will tell.
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. and Hemp Emu Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance CBD Product Manufacturing • BLEG • Jun 27, 2024 8:30 AM
POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • POET • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM