We should send ACLH info to news organizations not just to Jindell's office, you know how reporters are falling all over themselves for a story these days.
I also caught a leading biologist on MSNBC that was describing how the dispersants help the oil break into smaller molecules and "mix" or disolve into the water. This combination with the toxic dispersants contaminate the food marine animals consume and eventually kills them off...if the oil itself doesn't. They are currently trying to link 147 dead sea turtles to this scenario. The turtles aren't covered in oil but 3x the normal number for this time of year. His biggest fear was that when the chemicals hit the loop current they will be headed for the 3rd largest natural reef in the world.
With all the negative publicity, and now this order to use less harmful dispersant chemicals, why wouldn't BP be jumping at the chance to get in front of anyone and detail their plans to use an environmentally friendly ACLH product, even if it is only for hard surface cleanup?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.