InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,576.98
(
0.07%
)
US TECH 100
19,903.60
(
0.05%
)
Dow Jones
39,291.97
(
-0.13%
)
Brent Oil
84.49
(
-1.09%
)
Bitcoin
57,845.14
(
2.01%
)
Post# of 14386
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

howsmydrivingal

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 178
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/25/2006

howsmydrivingal

Re: None

Wednesday, 05/19/2010 2:58:09 PM

Wednesday, May 19, 2010 2:58:09 PM

Post# of 14386
Reading the latest.

EGMI UK claims the funds are there and in THEIR name.

EGMI USA claims because the wording going back to 2002, they support the 'fact' that the numbers can not be relied upon or the revenue claims by the parent EGMI USA are not what they are claimed to be due to the fact that much of those revenues would be under the company run in the UK. Apperently we have two companies.

Question I have is how can egmi UK get out of being liable to the current holders of egmi.pk? If they can't then which company has the deals or supposed deals in place?

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up