InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 1007
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/26/2010

Re: goodgodyall post# 118148

Sunday, 05/16/2010 6:53:17 PM

Sunday, May 16, 2010 6:53:17 PM

Post# of 131532
Expectations. I am expecting that INIX will release Q1 financials tomorrow. Since they are not required to do so this is a positive event in and of itself.

OK, but on the otherside, considering iFinix is going to be starting a managed accounts program as a public company I would expect nothing less than to be transparent with their financials as well start including more information provided in them.

Realtime start-up costs involving data feeds and other related costs will more than likely extend the balance sheet into the red. Possibly to a significant amount of red. There was also the Beckman Holdings acquisition that would likely result in high 1st Q costs including legal fees.

I believe Beckman was a shareholders purchase aka shares used as cash. So it'll depend on how they report to determine what cashed/costs was used / where. Im sure there is a significant amount needed to convert legals and so forth while transforming all entities into 1 base company

It would take a surge of revenue to overcome the costs associated with the forward investment spending involving Realtime and Beckman Holdings.

I hear that

Still, regardless of the red ink, the 1st Q has featured sizable events for INIX. Realtime and Beckman, though costly, are structural contributions for shareholders to embrace. An INIX play has been about the future and these events help accelerate the future into near future.

Yes, but have these events been priced in as of yet? I say they have.

I'll be more interested in the top line than the bottom line. For now, an increase in revenue (despite investment spending) will give shareholders greater insight to the future than the bottom line.

Cant always think that way... take, 3 more new hire-on yahooo's and we are back to where we may have ended the 09 year. The past 2 new hires arent 35-50K a year employees.

To a greater extent, I am interested in future structural contributions. What will we learn about the expansion of the product portfolio? Are the additional revenue streams progressing positively? Can we anticipate further top line growth for the remainder of the year?

Ok, so.... I think one must take what is expected of the future economy in hand when asking such questions or making such statements. . I do not think we can expect the company alone to be responsible for what may happen on the "public" side IE: "money to invest" thru iFinixs' brokerage/ managed accounts side. From where we are now I see an upward trend to a certain extent.
I do not see too many talk about this issue yet it is right in front of all our faces.



The few nay-sayers watching INIX will likely focus on the bottom line 1st Q results. I am hoping to celebrate some top line revenue increases.

What else is there to focus on except the cold hard facts? Top and Bottom lines. one of them will over-ride the other. While the company has some new revenue lines in the works these have been known about and most likely priced in at the current market. Untill investors start seeing "continued" increased revenues from "all" lines, hanging ones hat on old news could mean one may have to "pick" their hat up off the floor for the next couple of quarters.

On a side note, XQ. Email me: bernanke_nomics@yahoo
Id like to go further with the PM's we exchanged but cannot on here. I will not subscribe to ihub considering past events but would like to exchange ideas on the company. Dont need the .03 you suggested.
This does not mean that everyone else in dispute with my past posts should send a bunch of teenage like hate mail. Had enough of that on here...