InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 888
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/03/2006

Re: finbar99 post# 216

Thursday, 05/13/2010 2:45:12 PM

Thursday, May 13, 2010 2:45:12 PM

Post# of 323
The current situation was known by Dec '09 - there have been no subsequent material surprises - the flight had already left the gate for its current destination. Biotech Qs are almost always about the IP - if they were ever about the currently approved products - they wouldn't be in bk. My guess on MBRK would be that they overestimated the penetration they'd get with Moxatag, and overhired on the sales force - bad move - thanks to the powers that be for bad moves or there would be no such thing as bankrupt pennystocks. There was focus on the NOLs in the first day motions - from my experience, trading restriction motions usually come later. This suggests to me that the framework is well worked out, and involves savings the NOLs - which means no 363 sale of IP. They've outsourced distribution on Moxatag - very little burn left. Could MBRK become a sort of outsourcing platform company with Pulsys? Big Pharma loves to 'evergreen' their blockbusters with soon to be expired patent protection - changing the formulation to once a day works for this purpose - MBRK becomes a value added service provider - and with the NOLs in place, there is no after tax profit margin to calculate.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.