I'd like to see them stop playing both sides against the middle, as it were. On the one hand, they say that they expect the commons to have no value when all is said and done (as I believe Cork pointed out, a fairly boilerplate statement). On the other they make statements about "defending the interests of their shareholders" when trying to hold onto assets.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.