Brilliant Technologies Corp. (fka BLLN)

[grovertdog]

Hey good buddy Qurious- let's take a break from threatening posters who write things that scare you and instead talk BLLN.

I see you are "on board" with whatever you want to call this soft launch that isn't a launch. At least it seems you are, when you write this:

I look forward to many more soft launches... and expect them soon- I think it's great they are doing it this way- and don't buy any arguments against- I know the purpose of them and I think the next month is going to get nice!

See, here is where I get confused. You also wrote the following in post #18318, 10/24/09:

This whole time there have been people who have asked so many crazy questions about Qtrax, like... why don't they launch with two labels? Why don't they launch in this country and not that country? Etc. Etc. What they DON'T seem to understand is that the model depends on massive volume. They can't succeed on a small or decent number of users. That's what makes it so complicated, in my opinion. They have to have a massive audience, and it has to happen very quickly, so that people can see the potential of users... for ad revenue, etc. They can't start it half ass and hope that it grows. That simply won't work- and why it never worked with SF. Once I used them twice and couldn't find the music I felt like hearing, I never logged on again. Qtrax can't afford to have that. They have to get users to sign up and keep coming back, the users have to number in the millions.

So it's very important that they have millions of global users and that those users have a positive experience from day one.

It is interesting to me how you could be so definitive and specific with respect to how Qtrax SHOULD launch, and when they do exactly what you say they shouldn't, you think that is a good idea, too. Help me out here.