"You said "BUGS was obligated"
Sorry that you are confused. YOU said:
"Posted by: Admiral Lagrange Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 2:44:59 PM
In reply to: blackhawks who wrote msg# 6768 Post # of 6781
Bugs never said it was involved in the oil spill and has no obligation to get involved. Where you guys getting this crap from.'
I've never used the word 'obligated' in any post.
"The two oil plays are ACHL and MOPN, which proves you're just making meaningless and false statements."
These are your words: "That other oil cleanup play is crapping out...." You did not reference any other names so it was a reasonable inference that 'other' than BUGS was your meaning.
The only one 'irked' in these exchanges is the one forgetting or diasavowing what he posted.
And let's not be disingenuous. The interest in ALL of the stocks you've mentioned, including BUGS, was prompted by the oil spill.
The pps movement was also related to the oil spill news.
Doesn't mean that the interest or the pps movement was well founded, but it is what it is. Don't run away from your explicit statements implying that the 'other' oil plays are bogus/P&D's and BUGS is a sound investment because of underlying fundamentals that go beyond oil spill remediation, which BUGS is NOT positioned in from a business/revenue generating standpoint.
