InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 1298
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/16/2007

Re: wildcat 13 post# 3120

Friday, 05/07/2010 12:31:35 PM

Friday, May 07, 2010 12:31:35 PM

Post# of 44289
Hello fellow shareholders, I also waited a long time before posting. This is my first time. Wildcat has posted with wisdom. He points out VERT as a MM has been leaning on EQLB stating he thinks the Company has been selling. It is funny after Wildcat posted several of you have been responding to his post. The selling has ended. Their are many ways stock could be feed into the marketplace through third parties. I agree with Wildcat the company has done this. If they sold through a third party they could claim they did not sell stock. If their motive was to further the distribution of the product to increase sales,that is no excuse. It is still dilution. They could have done a private placement, or have a secondary distribution for full disclosure to all the shareholders. Instead we keep buying and stock goes lower. Today trading proves Wildcat hit a nerve. This is the way the stock should trade when investor own stock a cost higher than zero. I saw MO response to a fellow shareholder question in this matter. It is funny the selling has stopped. Also the company can sell through other MM than VERT. We will have to monitor the trading very closely. We all believe in the product, no question about that. We know salary and business expenses have to be paid. However when shareholder paid .20 cents for this stock they it will be a long time to turn over all this stock that has been distributed at such low prices between .01-.02 If the company is
legit they will not tell us. This is not a reporting company.
We will have to hope they show profits and the stock will go up.
Blackcat7717