chinditone, Once again you seem incapable of comment without name calling and insinuation. I am not a basher, and I am quite capable of research. I can also submit posts without childish name calling. I will respond to your post point for point:
1.I think others are able to decide for themselves what they care to listen to or ignore. I have already shown that SharingWay does not have 28 million members. An email from a SharingWay contact also plainly states that the 100,000+ cards are in ANTICIPATION of a campaign to raise members. They don't have anyone waiting presently for those all of those cards. Those are facts and have been verified. I have not created doubt, but have simply dissected the recent PR's and posted the findings. I did not craft the PR's in question.
2. If you are an investor and someone refutes claims in a PR that turn out to be false, I should think you should take it into consideration, not discount it out of hand and bury your head in the sand.
a)I would replace "probable" access, to "possible access" to some unknown base of potential advertizing targets. You may think differently, but I don't believe it wise to use fluffed up, best case scenereos when making investment decisions. Most especially when the numbers in the PR have already proven to be fluffed up beyond measure.
b)It is not necessary to look into the 100,000 member question, because a spokeswoman for SharingWay already informs us that the cards were ordered IN ANTCIPATION of a campaign. Of course it is reasonable to conclude that they will raise some members. I do know however, that SharingWay's past efforts to raise funds by having clients register their existing cards, produced very little results. I know this because I already have emailed or telephoned listed charities.
Yes, they have ordered 100,000+ cards, we know this.
SharingWay's reliability is not in question. ZKID's projections based upon false or hopefull numbers is. The projections, in my opinion, are erronious because the underlying numbers which those projections are predicated upon are false and misleading.
c)It does not, as you state, depend upon "your interest" in ZKID. It depends upon the truthfulness of the initial numbers that all of the projections are based upon. Sure, you can take a calculator, and the erronious numbers from the PR and knock yourself out guessing what may happen if any of this pans out. But I disagree with you that this is what investing is all about. In fact, I liken it to nothing more than daydreaming.
In final response to your comment about my skillset, Maybe you are right. Who knows? But I think that your constant name calling and your rude and callous insinuations are out of place.
Have a good day,
jc
