InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 1366
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/04/2009

Re: Slojab post# 3476

Monday, 04/26/2010 10:06:06 AM

Monday, April 26, 2010 10:06:06 AM

Post# of 8105
Gotcha. I don't think (disclosure of) exact songs in their possession have been publically released... clearly none of the other info (as that suggesseted in my stickies) has been released by the company - any mention of which I think would result in quite the spike, and be counter-productive to the platform they're establishing, which includes engaging big investors. Thus, the company and communications have (IMHO) pulled back and created an information caccoon- they're incubating... they don't want to run the market when they're in developmental stage, opportunities only they know about, wanting to engage big investors (etc.)...

As such, they DON'T care about the pps for now... and certainly not PK investors... they're shooting higher... and IMHO when news is released, we can be "assured" they're "ready"... IMHO, it will be into a solid business platform/plan....

Note also, in my last inquiry about the effective date of the 1/1000 r/s, the communications company essentially said, "They've got a LONG ways to go before the 1000/1 r/s... a lot needs to happen...". Don't know what that means, but reveals, again, that they're not being capricious about this... they recognize a solid business needs to precede their knowledge of news-effect on the market....

Thus, the question remains... as speculative as when any of us got on board: does prospective liability with 1000/1 r/s justify acquiring more shares at this level? On the low side, takes it to $.50... my personal opinion is "yes", but there are no guarantees... no evidence of profit or profitability vis-a-vis an established market, etc...