We'll just have to agree to disagree, as while CCG certainly wouldn't have prevented non-affiliate shareholders from taking profits, they would bring in the necessary interest required to keep the stock price up. Here we are with EPS guidance (and allegedly higher guidance on the way) between .29 and .32, yet the stock trades with a forward P/E of 3.5 and I GUARANTEE you that if CCG were the acting IR right now, the forward P/E would be NO LESS than 5, or a current PPS of $1.60 and that's just a fact based upon the companies that CCG represents that are pink sheeters, i.e. RHGP and soon-to-be YHGG. I also GUARANTEE you that CCG would be getting SIAF into absolutely every investor conference there is without making up lame excuses, one after another. I also GUARANTEE you that CCG would have already had SIAF uplisted by now or at least had the application filed. Regarding fluff PR's, I don't recall saying there have been fluff PR's, yet I said PR's were put out repeatedly for the purpose of insider dumping, meaning related third parties. Right now, SIAF's IR is amateur hour at its finest and I'm very worried that IR is leading management down the wrong path, a path that is anything but shareholder friendly.
AI
