#28 seems to confirm a lie about the late release of the audited 2009 10K. The 8K issued on 9/16 and #28 say different things. And the stock promoters really ran with this in Sept 2009. #28 and the 8k can’t both be correctly stated.
8k “the Company would be required to have its financial statements re-audited by a PCAOB-registered firm for any year previously audited by Drakeford in order for the Company to include such financial statements in its future filings with the SEC”
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.