InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 2099
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/04/2007

Re: HighRider post# 34852

Wednesday, 04/21/2010 9:18:25 PM

Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:18:25 PM

Post# of 60939
Just my opinion, but Calypso has standing in almost any variation on the scenario you can think of. They owned the patent outright before the Diac Suit. They owned a portion of it after the agreement that ended the suit. Diac could assign his portion of the patent, but only his portion. And, as a party claiming rights to the patent, Calypso is a party with an interest in the litigation. All this is assuming that Diac never fulfills his part of the bargain until he (hopefully) looses all rights in the state court action.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.