International Power Group Ltd (IPWG)

[ellkay]

Hi power,

Ok number one..
Doesn't it show that they offered to put the same amount of registered shares in an account for the DTC? Do you see anywhere why the DTC refused this or if they offered up a better solution?

Number two:
I see what you are saying about Jon Benvengo using message board posts as evidence of hurting the stock PPS seeming odd since he said not to believe everything posted on boards BUT I wouldn't find it hard to believe that he also has these posters ready to back the posts up if need be?

Also, I have seen a few posts mentioning that this latest event equals IPWG not being able to get the chill lifted. I don't agree entirely as it hasn't gotten that far yet as the SEC has outlined a timeline in which they want answers from both IPWG and the DTC in order to make a decision.
This denial, as it appears to me, was simply a denial on lifting it before the final decision is made because the claim was made it is hurting the PPS.
Am I correct in this , in your opinion?
I thought IPWG had a valid case to that claim and felt the chill should have been lifted because I always believed innocent unless proven guilty.
I'm neither a pumper nor a basher, just a shareholder who of course would love for this to happen but I do see the reality that it may not..
Thanks for your courteous replies.