"And about the interview! The interview is important. very very important! Many companies' stock prices surged after such interviews (e.g. IMGG)"
No 'and about', about it. That was the key point of my post. You ARE guessing that the interview will result in a pps rise leading into it and a bump right after it. Many companies prices also did nothing or fell after such interviews.
Most investors know that these types of interviews are not used to release substantive NEW info. Money TV's circulation is too limited to avoid violating insider info regulations absent a press release preceeding the interview. So yes, you are hoping, predicting.....guessing that the interview will be a catalyst for a pps rise.
"Many try to look smart on the boards when they only look at techinical analysis - Moving averages, MACD, Fibonacci, Elliot waves, papttern, candle sticks and many more techniques and tools..."
Couldn't agree with you more on that statement. But so too do people "try to look smart" when they claim that they can..."read the emotions and psychology of others in a stock market."
You can infer fear and greed at work in the market, but an inference is also a guess as to what is going on.
The 'hope', 'should' and 'I think' in your last paragraph is a more accurate read on your 'predictive powers'.
AI
