InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,346.99
(
-0.11%
)
US TECH 100
18,488.00
(
-0.25%
)
Dow Jones
38,798.99
(
-0.22%
)
Brent Oil
79.40
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
69,428.40
(
0.14%
)
Post# of 42851
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Nightdaytrader

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 43
Posts 5130
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/19/2002

Nightdaytrader

Re: steved_45 post# 20774

Sunday, 04/18/2010 12:28:41 PM

Sunday, April 18, 2010 12:28:41 PM

Post# of 42851
steved_45, again, you're not correct.

1.) You said P's have to be paid full value before commons see anything. I said that is not true and than in a settlement, P's could get a percentage of full value so that commons could get paid something. You then said I'm arguing "symantics". See items 2 & 3 below.

2.) Before you use these big words, you might want to look up the spelling and meaning. It's not symantics, it's "semantics".

3.) I'm not arguing "semantics". In item #1 above, you said something that wasn't true and I corrected you. That's not "semantics".

ND9
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up