Wednesday, December 22, 2004 7:31:54 PM
Effective drugs are being pilloried because of certain low levels of adverse side effects. DNAP could obviously reduce the occurence of the effect by developing effective classifiers. They will NOT eliminate them, their own data shows a certain level of effectiveness but it is NOT 100%. Some people will still die.
Carry the concept to the next level. What happens when a drug is developed that absolutely cures a major disease (lung cancer, diabetes or heart disease) but it's side effects kill 50% of it's patients. If DNAP can reduce that effect to 1% will that be good enough? 0.5% ? 0.001? Where will you put the limit?
Like I said the hard decisions will still need to be made. DNAP may be able to help with the trend toward safety but only an idiot would expect them to 'resolve' the problem.
FEATURED Southern Silver Files NI43-101 Technical Report for its Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Cerro Las Minitas Project • Jul 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM