InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,240.03
(
1.04%
)
US TECH 100
17,798.00
(
1.23%
)
Dow Jones
38,997.66
(
0.76%
)
Brent Oil
76.66
(
0.84%
)
Bitcoin
57,356.14
(
2.33%
)
Post# of 83046
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

utah-D

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 1
Posts 155
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/03/2010

utah-D

Re: Lucky_1 post# 62575

Wednesday, 04/14/2010 2:58:29 PM

Wednesday, April 14, 2010 2:58:29 PM

Post# of 83046
The most concerning part of that document for me is this statement

106.2 - 9

"Most of the copper minerals have actually reported to the tailings in the material processed to date"

Let's hope they can reprocess those and figure out a way to not have this happen in the future.

As to groundwater contamination, if most of the copper is in the rocks in the first place and we're not pulling it out, wouldn't the possibility of contamination be essentially the same as if we had just left the rocks there and they got rained on?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up